Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education
Sci Ed 1-26, 2008
Leah A. Bricker, Philip Bell
Argumentation has become an increasingly recognized focus for science instruction---as a learning process, as an outcome associated with the appropriation of scientific discourse, and as a window onto the epistemic work of science. Only a small set of theoretical conceptualizations of argumentation have been deployed and investigated in science education, however, while a plethora of conceptualizations have been developed in the interdisciplinary fields associated with science studies and the learning sciences. This paper attempts to review a range of such theoretical conceptualizations of argumentation and discuss the possible implications for the orchestration of science education; the goal being that the science education research community might consider a broader range of argumentation forms and roles in conjunction with the learning of science.
Showing posts with label Bricker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bricker. Show all posts
2008-03-18
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)